Education access & delivery challenges: Public hearings Day 5
Meeting Summary
In the Committee’s public hearings into access for all, Leaders in Learning submitted that the current crisis in education was the result of the failure of teacher training institutions to address the process of learning and the lack of indication from curricula as to how best to implement the relevant content. The whole-brain teaching and learning approach needed to be adopted in order to redress this. To this end Leaders in Learning would draw up a user-friendly manual which, after consultation with various expert teachers, would be distributed to all schools. A model lesson recorded on a Digital Versatile Disc would also, when ready, be distributed to all schools.
Members asked whether the curricula at tertiary training facilities of universities provided for this approach, whether there were international examples of this approach forming part of teacher training, and whether this approach tried to optimise the learning potential of all learners.
The General Motors South Africa Foundation called for the decentralisation of district offices and the creation of circuit teams. This would bridge the divide between office-based officials and schools and their needs. The Foundation had, in 2001, initiated a project with the Eastern Cape Provincial Education Department which looked at putting together a more effective district office system. Though not implemented in the
Members asked how easy it was to implement the circuit teams, especially in relation to cost, and personnel, how long the pilot project had been running and when its results were expected, and how this concept would affect employment methods.
Members asked whether there was any vocational training for those 18 years and older, how many teachers there were at the school, how the learning of those children who constantly left and returned was managed, whether the causes for children’s becoming street children were dealt with, whether there were any statistics on how many learners dropped out as a result of learning barriers, how this school’s operational model could move to other areas, and how the school was funded.
The
Members asked no questions orally since the meeting was adjourned at the end of the University’s submission.
Meeting report
Leaders in Learning submission
Dr Johan Swartz, Director, Leaders in Learning, said that there was a crisis in education in
Discussion
Ms J Kloppers-Lourens (DA) asked whether the curricula at tertiary training facilities of universities provided for this approach.
Mr Swartz answered that this approach was not adopted in universities as the approach there was largely on didactics.
The Chairperson asked whether there were international examples of this approach forming part of teacher training. Did this approach try to optimise the learning potential of all learners?
Mr Swartz answered that this approach had been carefully researched and it was of little relevance to him whether it had been adopted elsewhere in the world. What was important was that
GM South Africa presentation
Mr A Forbes, Programme Director, General Motors South Africa Foundation (GM South Africa Foundation), said that one of the main factors contributing towards the decline of education in South Africa currently was the divide that existed between schools and office-based officials. The solution to this would be to decentralise the district offices and to create circuit teams thorough which experts would visit schools so as to assist them with their needs. The Foundation had, in 2001, initiated a project with the Eastern Cape Provincial Education Department which looked at putting together a more effective district office system. This system would bring support and service delivery to these schools. Though the model was accepted by all the relevant stakeholders it was never implemented. The central feature of this model was the idea of the circuit team – the most critical delivery mechanism for district offices. The district offices in the
Discussion
Mr J Lorimer (DA) asked how easy it was to implement the circuit teams, especially in relation to cost, personnel etc. How long had the pilot project been running and when were its results expected?
Mr Forbes answered that it was expected to run for three years. It was however was not strictly necessary to wait for the pilot project’s results as the Western Cape districts had already yielded favourable results after implementing the circuit teams.
Ms F Mushwana (ANC) asked how this concept would affect employment methods.
Mr Forbes answered that there had been a major challenge around resistance from officials.
The Chairperson asked for a more easily comprehensible written submission to be re-submitted.
Ms Jane Bradshaw, Principal, Grahamstown Amasango Career School, which was a registered public special school established to meet the needs of learners with extrinsic barriers to learning, said that pupils in her school were admitted through self-referral as street children were found to be independent and would not remain in school for long if they were forced to attend. Baselines tests were then conducted in order to establish whether these children had a basic foundation in education. Twenty percent of these children dropped out (mainly as a result of overcrowding, drug addiction and teenage pregnancy and HIV/AIDS), though they were allowed to attend classes again as the school did not reject any children. Discipline was consistently applied at the school, with the principle of ‘choices and consequences’ being drilled into them. There was a zero tolerance policy on crime and the police were brought in when having to deal with serious crime. In the absence of an adult to represent a child in court, a school staff member took on this role.
Extrinsic barriers to learning were barriers caused by one or a combination of psycho-social circumstances which caused the learner to drop far behind his or her academic cohort. Severe emotional and behavioural problems made it very difficult for children to access the curriculum.
Basic Education needed to take cognizance of the fact that there were many thousands of broken, hurt, disturbed children out there who did not “fit” into mainstream education or any of the traditional special needs categories.
Many of these children were street children, others just sat at home, others lived off city dumpsites and others were expected to act as shepherds and herdsmen. Others were prostitutes and drug runners. Yet these young people had rights to appropriate care and education. Mrs Bradshaw had founded the school and had begun pioneering education for street children in the
Although the children were feed thrice a day, it was first and foremost a school. Children were therefore not given meals if they did not attend classes. A blinkered, one-size-fits-all approach to education was not an effective one. Vocational education for over-aged learners in primary schools, who were not making exceptional academic progress, was needed.
Discussion
Ms M Kubayi (ANC) asked whether there were any vocational training for those 18 years and older. How many teachers were currently at the school? How was the learning of those children who constantly left and returned managed?
Ms Bradshaw answered that this was a critical issue as mainstream education did not cater adequately for older learners. Primary schools should be allowed to teach vocational training to these learners in order to equip them for employment. There were currently 18 teachers at the school. Erratic attendance was a challenge. However, as learners were graded quarterly, this minimised the chances of non-regular attendance negatively affecting other learners.
Ms Kloppers-Lourens asked whether the issues that resulted in the children becoming street children were dealt with. Were there any statistics on how many learners dropped out as a result of learning barriers?
Ms Bradshaw answered that poverty was the main cause. There were only a few intellectually challenged children at the school.
Ms Mushwana asked how this school’s operational model could move to other areas.
Ms Bradshaw answered that, as this was a national problem, the Department of Education should take this model and implement it nationally.
The Chairperson asked how the school was funded.
Ms Bradshaw answered that although all salaries were paid by the Department of Education, the school received nothing from it for the social care of the children. A charity had been established in
Ms C Uys, lecturer,
Members asked no questions orally since the meeting was adjourned at the end of the University’s submission.
The meeting was adjourned.
Documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.