1. (a) The irregular expenditure was reported to the Accounting Officer and Labour Relations for investigation and further handling. The irregular expenditure is recorded in the irregular expenditure register pending the investigation, in line with National Treasury Guidelines.
b) The investigation is still pending the results of the investigation will determine the action to be taken by the Department.
2. (a) The Accounting Officer ...
|
(aa) The past three years |
(a) (i)Total amount budgeted |
(ii) Total Expenditure |
|
R’000 |
R’000 |
|
|
2014/15 |
41 778 |
41 767 |
|
2015/16 |
42 308 |
42 298 |
|
2016/17 |
28 499 |
39 313 |
|
(bb) Since April 2017 |
(a) (i)Total amount budgeted |
(ii) Total Expenditure |
|
R’000 |
R’000 |
|
|
(bb) Since April 2017 |
41 794 |
36 893 |
|
(b)(i) REMUNERATION |
(ii) SALARY LEVEL ... |
1. (a) No procurement and/or services were made to Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd by the Department of Energy
(i) Not applicable
(ii) No payments were made to Travel with Flair (Pty) Ltd.
(b) (i) Other than the National Nuclear Regulator none of the other entities reporting to the Minister of Energy have procured any services from Travel With Flair
(ii) R 2, 027, ...
a) At the conclusion of the Audit there was a dispute between the Department and the Auditor- General on the amount of irregular expenditure. The Minister of Energy has since met with the Auditor-General and the matter in dispute has been resolved.
b) (i) The area of concern that had been identified by the Auditor- General was understatement of irregular expenditure.
(ii) Steps to ...
a) The total cost of the involvement of the SA Nuclear Energy Corporation ‘s mobile hot cell in the removal of high activity sealed radioactive sources from 87 teletherapy units in the Federative Republic of Brazil was R 35 663 397.17.
b) No funds were budgeted by NECSA for the Mobile Hot Cell operation as the operation was in Brazil and funded by the United States ...
a) Yes, the Department had a contract with Mahlako-A-Phahla Investment.
(i) Services rendered were for transactional advisory to review the state of readiness for the Nuclear New Build Programme.
(ii) The initial contract was for three (3) months, i.e. 27 May to 26 August 2016 with further extension of four (4) months starting from 1 September to December 2016.
(iii) The department paid R20 174 ...
In carrying out its mandate, the Department develops legislation, undertakes programs and projects, and in that process interacts with a plethora of stakeholders and industry players of varying nature. This for example may take a form of bilateral meetings, visits, conferences, etc. and therefore it is practically impossible to mention with specific engagements that the department, often represented by different officials at different levels, ...
More »a) The matter was asked during the meeting of the Portfolio committee on Energy on the 22 November 2017.
b) The Minister reaffirms the same answer provided to the committee.
1. a) NERSA did not reverse any decision related to Eskom‘s coal contracts and costs. The decision taken by NERSA was that Eskom‘s information relating to coal contracts and cost not be published as it contained commercially sensitive information. Eskom has submitted all requested information to NERSA.
b) NERSA did not reverse any decision. (Limiting information only to the personnel of the Regulator ...
a) Yes, I accompanied H.E President Jacob Zuma on a working visit to the Russian Federation.
b) No