About

Contact

Find my representatives

Find those who have been elected to represent you in government

Find those who have been elected to represent you in government

Use my location

Find representatives

Find by name

Find by committee

Search for MPs and MPLs

Legislatures

National Parliament

National Assembly

National Council of Provinces

Provincial Legislatures

Browse by province

Eastern Cape

Free State

Gauteng

Kwazulu-Natal

Limpopo

Mpumalanga

Northern Cape

North West

Western Cape

MP Performance

Follow the activities of representatives and hold them accountable

Follow the activities of representatives and hold them accountable

Activities & Performance

Questions to ministers

pmg external link icon

Parliamentary committees

pmg external link icon

MP Corner

Transparency

Attendance of meetings

Members' interests

Code of conduct

pmg external link icon

Civic Education

Learn more about governance in South Africa and your representatives

Learn more about governance in South Africa and your representatives

From our blog

Infographics

All articles

Understanding government

Central Tenets of Government

Structure of Government

How are laws made?

State Institutions Supporting Democracy

Take action

Find the actions you can take to participate in governance

Find the actions you can take to participate in governance

Have Your Say

Write to an MP

Write to a Committee

Get involved

Petitions

Visit Constituency Offices

Attending and observing parliament

Participating in calls for comment

About

Contact

  • Home »
  • Hansard »
  • 2012 »
  • September »
  • 11 »
  • PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (Tuesday, 11 September 2012)

CONSIDERATION OF REPORT OF PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES - JUDICIAL INSPECTORATE FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2010-11

  • ← CONSIDERATION OF REPORT OF PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ENTERPRISES - ANNUAL REPORTS OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES AND STATE-OWNED COMPANIES
  • FINANCIAL CRISIS AFFECTING GROWTH IN SOUTH AFRICA (Debate on African - Caribbean - Pacific States - European Union topic) →
  • (narrative) 11 Sep 2012 hansard
    There was no debate.
    Link in context Link
  • Picture of Gregory David Schneemann
    Mr G D Schneemann hansard

    On behalf of the Chief Whip of the Majority Party, I move:

    That the Report be noted.

    Declarations of vote:

    Link in context Link
  • Picture of Paul Bushy Mnguni
    Mr P B Mnguni hansard

    House Chair, managing crime and criminals is not an easy task. However, South Africa is fortunate in that this responsibility is not just for government alone, but for the whole nation, because crime has become a major and national stress factor inside and outside prisons.

    As a member who recently joined the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services, it soon became clear to me that the relationship between the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services, Jics, and the department and its executives is not fully functional.

    The department seems "unsuitable" to Jics and does not take the recommendations or the work of Jics seriously. Yet Jics sees where the gaps exist and where they should be filled in the entire operation of the department. The inspectorate's duty is to ensure that every human right of people in our correctional centres is protected.

    Cope echoes Jics's call that the Department of Correctional Services should not be notorious for segregation in prisons, the selective transfer of inmates, deaths in prisons, torture and assault by officials, pathetic medical care and controversial parolees. The relationship between the National Council for Correctional Services and Jics must be streamlined. As such, the Act must be amended. However, over the years the work of Jics has been stifled, because they rely on the very same Minister with whom they have issues relating to the implementation of their recommendations. That is an untenable situation.

    Cope recognises the need to rewrite the Correctional Services Act. Chapter 9 of the Correctional Services Act of 1998 provides for the establishment of Jics as an independent entity, managed by an inspecting judge, according to section 85(1) of this Act. So, Jics was created by an Act of Parliament and should report their activities to Parliament directly, without fear of interference from the Minister.

    Cope recognises that, according to section 91 of the Correctional Services Act, the Department of Correctional Services is responsible for Jics's expenses. Cope would like to see the separation of financial authorities in order to guarantee the independence of Jics. Cope would also like to see Jics's financial independence rectified through the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to which South Africa is a signatory.

    The Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act of 2009 provides for, among other things, a parliamentary procedure to amend Money Bills, thus granting parliamentary committees greater opportunity to sway the allocation of funds directly to Jics through section 5. Jics falls right within this call.

    Link in context Link
  • Picture of Velaphi Bethuel Ndlovu
    Mr V B Ndlovu hansard

    Chairperson, while the IFP supports the report, we want to put on record that the work of the Inspecting Judge must be respected by the department. The experience we have is that the department always looks down on the Inspecting Judge's recommendations. We want that to be taken on board when the report of the judge is presented to this department and to the portfolio committee, so that what the Judicial Inspectorate is doing is recognised by the department and is therefore implemented.

    Secondly, the independence of the Judicial Inspectorate should be respected by the department. The department always frustrates the Inspecting Judge when it is doing its work. Therefore, the responsibility of the Inspecting Judge and the inspectorate must be properly respected. People working under the inspectorate must be respected so that they can identify problems. The department should adhere to recommendations made by the Inspecting Judge. We should be able to know exactly how far we are going to make sure that the rights of people who are in incarceration are protected and not violated.

    Link in context Link
  • Picture of James Selfe
    Mr J Selfe hansard

    House Chairperson, the Judicial Inspectorate of Correctional Services plays an absolutely essential role in ensuring that all people who are incarcerated in our prisons are held in conditions of human dignity. Because of that, many strategy provisions are laid down in the Correctional Services Act on which the department has to report to the Judicial Inspectorate. These include the reporting and investigating of deaths of prisoners in non-natural circumstances, the segregation of prisoners and the use of mechanical constraints. What we are finding in the portfolio committee is that, as often as not, these things occur in the department without their being reported. In other words, the intention of the Act is being undermined by the officials on the ground.

    That says to us that the very important work done by the Judicial Inspectorate is not being taken seriously, so much so that in one case an official of the Judicial Inspectorate was denied entry into the Vanrhynsdorp Correctional Centre. For that reason, we support the proposal that has served before the portfolio committee: that the Judicial Inspectorate gets its own budget, that it is made independent of the Department of Correctional Services so that it can act without fear and favour; and that Parliament ought to take its recommendations very seriously because it is the institution that is going to ensure that prisons are not run in the way they were under the apartheid regime. [Applause.]

    Motion agreed to.

    Report accordingly noted.

    Link in context Link
  • ← CONSIDERATION OF REPORT OF PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ENTERPRISES - ANNUAL REPORTS OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES AND STATE-OWNED COMPANIES
  • FINANCIAL CRISIS AFFECTING GROWTH IN SOUTH AFRICA (Debate on African - Caribbean - Pacific States - European Union topic) →

Correct this page

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Sitemap

  • Home
  • Rep Locator
  • People
    • Find by name
    • Parliament
      • National Assembly
      • National Council of Provinces
    • Provinces
      • Eastern Cape
      • Free State
      • Gauteng
      • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Limpopo
      • Mpumalanga
      • Northern Cape
      • North West
      • Western Cape
  • Blog
  • MP Profiles
  • MP Attendance
  • Public Participation
    • Make yourself heard
    • Elections
      • Election 2014 Candidates
      • Election 2019 Candidates
    • Petitions
    • Write to a Committee
  • Hot Topics
    • Questions
    • MP Assets
    • MP Corner
    • Infographics
  • Links
  • Get the data
  • For Representatives

Contact us

People's Assembly
contact@pa.org.za

Tel: (021) 465 8885

Fax: (021) 465 8887

2nd Floor 9 Church Square Parliament Street
Cape Town 8001
South Africa

Disclaimer

The data for this site has been sourced form a range of organisations and websites and often received in formats that are hard to process. As a result, errors can occur - if you see something that you think is an error, please click on the "Correct This Page" button and let us know so that we can investigate. Please click here to read more about our source data.

  • Privacy
  • Give us feedback

This site runs on open source code written by mySociety.