This means that the Constitution, as it stands, does allow for expropriation without compensation in certain cases. My question, therefore is: On whose behalf is the Constitution is the Constitution being amended? Certainly, not the millions of South Africans ... [Interjections.] ... who are hungry for land. Will amending the Constitution solve the problem of corruption in the land reform process? Will amending the Constitution allow for more budget allocation for land reform? [Interjections.] Will amending the Constitution create capable and efficient government officials who are fit for purpose? [Interjections.] Will amending the Constitution render more political will in the governing party for land reform?