(1) No, my office did not cancel the Management Performance Assessment Tool.
(2)(a)
|
Year |
Cost |
|
2012 |
561 742,13 |
|
2013 |
633 305,13 |
|
2014 |
790 075,57 |
|
2015 |
470 142,25 |
|
2016 |
325 136,77 |
|
Grand Total |
2 780 401,85 |
(2)(b) No, this cannot be considered as wasteful expenditure.
(3) Indeed the tool has achieved its objectives, management practices have improved across the public service. Through 40 case studies documented, departments have the opportunity to draw key lessons and improve their working environment. This maturity and institutionalisation is at a strong basis with which MPAT can move forward to measure capabilities and performance.
|
Approved |
Not Approved |
Approved as amended |
||
|
Comment: |
||||
|
Dr NC Dlamini-Zuma Minister in the Presidency: Planning Monitoring and Evaluation |
||||
|
Date: |