(1) An investigated was initiated on 22 February 2016.
(2) Yes, the investigation has been finalised.
(a) 01 July 2016.
(b) The findings are as per the table below:
Allegation |
Finding |
|
1 |
Unlawful/unilateral powers of the Executive Committee to change moderated performance scores. The CEO has powers to award discretionary bonuses. |
The allegation was unfounded. |
2 |
Unilateral blanket correction of scores. |
The allegation was substantiated.
|
3 |
Implementation of performance-based salary increases. |
The allegation was unfounded. Executive Management, however, incorrectly applied Board Resolution in determining salary increases (upward adjustment of 0.16%), without justification. |
4 |
The CEO sets commercial targets for SAWS in terms of organisational performance. |
The allegation was unfounded. |
5 |
The former General Manager: Corporate Affairs was awarded a performance bonus despite being on a prolonged leave of absence during the assessment period. |
The allegation was unfounded. The former General Manager: Corporate Affairs was, however, overpaid by an amount of R9 270.22 and the money was refunded to the SAWS. |
---ooOoo---