(1) (a) What is the exact amount involved in the double payments to State Information Technology Agency (Sita) reported in a certain report (details furnished) and (b) what mechanisms does Sita have in place to monitor double payments; (2) whether the board chairperson has been convicted on 12 counts of late payment of employee tax to the SA Revenue Service; if so, (a) what steps have been taken against the chairperson, (b) what steps will be taken to improve the negative impact this has on Sita’s reputation and (c) what mechanisms are in place to ensure good governance in this regard; (3) whether he has taken any steps against a certain person (details furnished) for conflicting business interests; if not, why not; if so, what steps; (4) what is the rate of compliance with the financial disclosure framework (FDF) in Sita; (5) whether Sita requires its employees to declare spousal and family interests linked to its business operations; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many (i) spouses and (ii) family members of employees benefited from tenders awarded in the past 10 years and (b) to which Sita employees were such beneficiaries related?