Whether, in light of the Public Protector’s report (details furnished), her department has (a) instructed the state attorney to obtain the opinion of the counsel, (b) obtained such an opinion and (c) taken the counsel’s advice into consideration; if not, why not in each case; if so, (i) which aspects of the counsel’s advice were taken into consideration and (ii) why did her department continue with the implementation of the lease agreement with a certain company (details furnished) after being provided with legal opinion of an independent senior counsel advising to the contrary?