(1) Whether the court interdict between his department and a certain community trust (name furnished) is still in place; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the legal constraints to fund projects; (2) whether his department has provided any funding through any other programmes to assist members of the trust; if not, why not; if so, (a) how much and (b) for what purpose; (3) whether a certain company (name furnished) has sound financial statements for the past four financial years; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether the said company has developed any social projects for their beneficiaries such as (a) access to water and sanitation, (b) schools or churches and (c) paying out monies in cash to beneficiaries; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, what role did his department play?