(1) To which senior staff member in his department does the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Companies and Intellectual Properties Registration Office (Cipro) report; (2) whether this person (a) monitors and evaluates the performance of Cipro on a continuous basis and (b) interrogated the allocation of the enterprise content management tender (ECM) to a certain company (name and details furnished) (i) before and/or (ii) after various allegations of wrongdoing were first raised in the press in April 2009; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether any actions were taken by this staff member to ensure that the regulations regarding the allocation of tenders of this magnitude were adhered to in the case of the ECM tender; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether any senior manager outside Cipro recommended and/or authorised (a) the allocation of the ECM tender and/or (b) any payments to the said company; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (5) whether he has found that the service standards of Cipro have been deteriorating in the past year and that allegations of various corrupt activities were true; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what types of corrupt activities were identified and (b) what steps have been taken to reverse this trend?