(1) Which (a) law firm and (b) advocates appeared on behalf of (i) her department and (ii) the SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) respectively in the court cases against the (aa) Opposition to Urban Tolling Aliiance (Outa) and (bb) Tollgate Action Group (TAG) in each separate case; (2) what legal costs were incurred up to date for each individual (a) lawyer in each of the law firms and (b) advocate that appeared on behalf of (i) her department and (ii) Sanral in each individual court case against (aa) Outa and (bb) TAG; (3) whether (a) she and/or (b) Sanral specifically instructed (i) their legal representatives and (ii) a certain advocate (name furnished) to seek a cost order against the representative and main applicant from TAG (name furnished) instead of a cost order against the organisation, TAG, itself; if not, (aa) why this advocate requested such a cost order and (bb) will she take action against the specified advocate; if so, (aaa) why this instruction was given and (bbb) what was the legal basis for this instruction?