(1) (a) What work has a certain company been contracted to perform in the Kruger National Park since 1 January 2010 and (b) how much money has been paid to it for work completed; (2) whether she has found that certain officials (names furnished) at the Kruger National Park have any personal connection with the (a) owners, (b) directors and (c) employees of the said company; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, how is this justified; (3) whether any action has been taken against the specified officials for awarding any contracts to the said company; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether the said company has ever been awarded a contract without a compulsory site inspection; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, how is this justified; (5) whether, for any tender that the said company was awarded, it came in second cheapest after a certain other business (name furnished); if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, why was the other business not awarded the tender?