(1) With reference to her reply to question 2089 on 31 August 2010, (a) what was the nature of the extensive study that she referred to, (b) who conducted the study and (c) what is the name of the report that contained the conclusions of the study; (2) whether there was a public consultation process around the decision to phase out plantations at Tokai and Cecilia; if not, how is this justified; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether there was a public consultation process on the future of Tokai and Cecilia plantations after the harvesting; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) (a) how many members of the public were (i) broadly against the Tokai and Cecilia Management Framework and (ii) broadly in favour of the framework and (b) how is the final framework being reconciled with the comments of the public; (5) why are members of the public excluded from gaining access by the current fencing off of portions of the plantations despite a commitment to the plantation areas remaining open for a full range of recreational activities?