(1) With reference to Eskom’s Revised Funding Plan submitted to Parliament on 22 April 2015 (details furnished), (a) why does the War Room consider it necessary to investigate whether to sell assets or equity to fund Eskom, (b) why was only 32,8% of outstanding funds arranged by 22 April 2015, (c) have any of the pledges which were received prior to 31 March 2014 been cancelled since then, (d) have any new pledges been arranged in the period 31 March 2014 and 22 April 2015 and (e) on what statutory provisions did Eskom rely in providing this information to Parliament; (2) (a) did she find Eskom’s statements, with reference to the Multi-Year Price Determination 3 Re-Opener for Selective Items (2015-16 to 2017-18), dated 16 March 2015 in which Eskom confirmed to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) that they had (i) reprioritised its capital portfolio (details furnished) and (ii) that R251billion of the R300billion could be funded through existing sources, to be correct and (b) was the further reprioritisation between 16 March 2015 and 22 April 2015 necessary due to massive cost overruns which had previously been hidden; (3) does Eskom’s Revised Funding Plan submitted to Parliament on 22 April 2015 supersede the Nersa application; if so, has Nersa been informed about it; (4) has Nersa, as guardian of the Grid Code, been informed by Eskom that transmission expenditure is planned to be drastically reduced from R75-billion (MYPD3) to R6billion (Re-opener); if so, what has Nersa’s response to Eskom been with regard to the impact of this reduced expenditure on compliance with the Grid Code; (5) has she given consideration to selling Medupi and Kusile to private investors?