(1) Whether, with regard to the alleged corruption, collusion with suspects and disappearance of critical evidence in case number CAS/487/08/2016 in the Diepkloof Police Station involving a certain person (name and details furnished), (a) he has taken any steps to effect the rule of law; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;(2) with regard to the long outstanding dispute (details attached), between the SA Police Services (SAPS), the Fund Administrator (Old Mutual), Financial Service Board and the former SAPS employee (name furnished) which I referred to the National Commissioner, General Khehla Sithole, on 6 February 2018 with no recourse except acknowledgement of receipt and promise for referral and response, (a) was the matter ever brought to his attention, if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the latest developments towards it being resolved and (b) will he make a statement on the matter;(3) with regard to the grievances by the reservists in Libode Police Station in the Eastern Cape that were sent to his office (details furnished) and that of the National Police Commissioner, General Khehla Sithole, (a) has his department addressed the matter, if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
(2) with regard to the long outstanding dispute (details attached), between the SA Police Services (SAPS), the Fund Administrator (Old Mutual), Financial Service Board and the former SAPS employee (name furnished) which I referred to the National Commissioner, General Khehla Sithole, on 6 February 2018 with no recourse except acknowledgement of receipt and promise for referral and response, (a) was the matter ever brought to his attention, if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the latest developments towards it being resolved and (b) will he make a statement on the matter;
(3) with regard to the grievances by the reservists in Libode Police Station in the Eastern Cape that were sent to his office (details furnished) and that of the National Police Commissioner, General Khehla Sithole, (a) has his department addressed the matter, if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?