House Chairperson, the hon member knows the answers to both the questions. I am just wondering whether I should take up the time of this House. But I will, nonetheless, respond. The Jobs Fund, as the hon Harris knows, is a new fund. It has already gone through two windows of applications, and the third one is about to be initiated. To date or up to the first window, some 39 projects have been approved, and R1,8 billion has been assigned. We also had a co-investment of R1,7 billion. So that gives us about R3,5 billion in terms of the collective investment in creating jobs. What we will have, as the process settles down, is a quicker processing of the applications, which is the assurance that we have given the committee. With regard to Public Sector salaries, we have a three-year deal. In the outer years, we have a CPI plus 1% arrangement. That, notwithstanding our earlier views on this matter, gives us some stability in terms of what we can expect and what we need to budget. So, we had to find the extra money. Fortunately, we did make provisions for these surprise factors, partly in the contingency amount, but also through various forms of savings and reprioritisation, as I explained earlier.
The agreement I have with the Minister of the Public Service and Administration is that we will now look into the R300-billion odd that we spent on Public Sector salaries and see where the further savings can, in fact, be made. Secondly, we have said that we do not want any more appointments in administrative functions in the Public Service. Thirdly, those appointments that need to be made need to be made in respect of frontline service delivery staff - teachers, doctors, etc. And, fourthly, there is still much work to do in terms of so-called surplus stuff that we have in certain categories in some of the provinces. Lastly, we will begin to work harder at reintroducing what was called the "Old chapter J" and put more controls in place before appointments can be made. Thank you. Vote No 11 - Public Enterprises - put.