About

Contact

Find my representatives

Find those who have been elected to represent you in government

Find those who have been elected to represent you in government

Use my location

Find representatives

Find by name

Find by committee

Search for MPs and MPLs

Legislatures

National Parliament

National Assembly

National Council of Provinces

Provincial Legislatures

Browse by province

Eastern Cape

Free State

Gauteng

Kwazulu-Natal

Limpopo

Mpumalanga

Northern Cape

North West

Western Cape

MP Performance

Follow the activities of representatives and hold them accountable

Follow the activities of representatives and hold them accountable

Activities & Performance

Questions to ministers

pmg external link icon

Parliamentary committees

pmg external link icon

MP Corner

Transparency

Attendance of meetings

Members' interests

Code of conduct

pmg external link icon

Civic Education

Learn more about governance in South Africa and your representatives

Learn more about governance in South Africa and your representatives

From our blog

Infographics

All articles

Understanding government

Central Tenets of Government

Structure of Government

How are laws made?

State Institutions Supporting Democracy

Take action

Find the actions you can take to participate in governance

Find the actions you can take to participate in governance

Have Your Say

Write to an MP

Write to a Committee

Get involved

Petitions

Visit Constituency Offices

Attending and observing parliament

Participating in calls for comment

About

Contact

  • Home »
  • Hansard »
  • 2012 »
  • April »
  • 26 »
  • PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PROVINCES (Thursday, 26 April 2012) »
  • DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL (Consideration of Bill and of Report thereon)
  • Cllr C Neethling (Salga) 26 Apr 2012 hansard

    Yes, Salga in the Free State - that is the Mayor of Mangaung. So, you know, the chances that he could be available are quite remote. In any case, we will see what we can do about that. Thank you, Mr Chair.

    Chairperson, the Division of Revenue Bill should, in terms of our Constitution, seek to strengthen the ability of provinces and municipalities to provide basic services and perform the functions allocated to them. It should thereby seek to progressively improve the living conditions and standards of all our constituents by means of providing for their developmental and other needs. The 2012 Division of Revenue Bill and local government allocations present a further opportunity to accelerate the attainment of universal access to municipal services.

    The Minister of Finance reported on the slowdown in economic growth of about 2,7% in the last fiscal year and expressed the anticipation of a recovery to about 3% in the 2012-13 financial year. Salga is appreciative of the difficult economic situation that the country finds itself in and the impact that has on the revenue streams of government. In fact, local government revenue is also directly affected by the downturn in the economic cycle. We therefore welcome the overall sentiment of the 2012 Budget, which seeks to protect allocations to local government but also calls for fiscal restraint and efficient and effective spending in the three spheres of government.

    With regard to the Division of Revenue Bill, it is noted that the Expanded Public Works Programme incentive grant to municipalities has been reviewed and Salga supports this, because the grant's focus areas are aligned to the mandate of local government. We do, however, call on national government to simplify the reporting system for this and other conditional grants to local government. Local government has to continuously bear the cost of compliance with national policies, which erodes already limited revenue sources for basic service delivery.

    We note the funding through in-kind transfers for municipal projects where local capacity is lacking. While this funding is indeed welcomed, there is a need for improved co-operation with receiving municipalities on the size of allocations and how this money will be spent by national departments and implementing agents. It is envisaged that the consultation processes should involve Salga.

    This Budget sets out a tight fiscal framework within which national revenue is divided between national, provincial and local government. It is noted that in the vertical division of revenue process, local government is allocated R77 billion or 8,8% of nationally raised revenue in 2012-13.

    We are aware of the huge challenges that some municipalities face in spending their annual allocations, especially infrastructure grants. However, we are confident that in working together with national government on interventions such as the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency of the Department for Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs positive impacts can be made.

    Regarding equity share allocations, local government receives R37,9 billion in 2012-13, R40,6 billion in 2013-14 and R43,6 billion in 2014-15 of equitable share, which is an upwards revision to the baselines by R2,2 billion over the next three years. It is noted that the equitable share makes provision to sustain basic service delivery and further revisions towards strengthening governance and administration in smaller municipalities.

    Government also provided R9 billion in 2012-13 as the metros' share of the general fuel levy that has now been fully phased in. Salga has been processing a national conference resolution to apply for a local business tax for economic infrastructure and services, and a process of engagement with key stakeholders has already commenced. Further consultation will be held with National Treasury ahead of our application.

    Salga is of the view that local government allocations in this Budget do not fully consider some fundamental issues affecting local government at the moment. Firstly, the steep increases in the prices of bulk services such as electricity and water impact on the sustainability of basic service provision by local government. If this trend continues, more and more residents will fall outside the affordability net, further compromising revenue management in local government. National allocations to local government should take this into consideration and increases should be in excess of annual inflation.

    Secondly, many municipalities continue to carry the burden of unfunded or underfunded mandates for services rendered on behalf of provincial government. In addition, the fiscal impact on local government of national legislation as well as demarcation processes is not always fully comprehended. The Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences, Aarto, and the incorporation of the former Metsweding District Municipality into the City of Tshwane are cases in point.

    Finally, in this regard, we are involved in a task team with National Treasury on reviewing the local government equitable share based on the new census data. We have stated for some time now that such a review will require proper costing of basic services and sustainable funding for smaller and rural municipalities that have limited rates and service income. We are therefore of the opinion that Parliament will need to consider a baseline revision of the vertical division of revenue, which is currently at about 8%.

    With regard to the conditional grants, Salga notes the conditional grant allocations to local government amounting to R30,4 billion in 2012-13, R33,7 billion in 2013-14 and R36,9 billion in 2014-15. It is duly noted that additional funding of R5,4 billion has been allocated to fast-track the upgrading of informal settlements in large cities; provision of bulk infrastructure; solid waste management in rural municipalities; and electricity demand-side management.

    A number of changes were made to local government conditional grants, such as the creation of the infrastructure skills development grant, which we support. There are, however, a number of changes made to the baseline allocations of existing conditional grants that are not adequately explained in the Budget documentation.

    Salga is of the view that instead of cutting certain grants due to underspending, like the neighbourhood development and partnership grant for township renewal, national government should rather amend its implementation policies and raise awareness of the existence of the different grants available to municipalities. Another example is the policy decision to incorporate the rural household infrastructure grant into the municipal infrastructure grant, which is going to change the flow of funding. [Time expired.]

    Link in context Link

Correct this page

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Sitemap

  • Home
  • Rep Locator
  • People
    • Find by name
    • Parliament
      • National Assembly
      • National Council of Provinces
    • Provinces
      • Eastern Cape
      • Free State
      • Gauteng
      • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Limpopo
      • Mpumalanga
      • Northern Cape
      • North West
      • Western Cape
  • Blog
  • MP Profiles
  • MP Attendance
  • Public Participation
    • Make yourself heard
    • Elections
      • Election 2014 Candidates
      • Election 2019 Candidates
    • Petitions
    • Write to a Committee
  • Hot Topics
    • Questions
    • MP Assets
    • MP Corner
    • Infographics
  • Links
  • Get the data
  • For Representatives

Contact us

People's Assembly
contact@pa.org.za

Tel: (021) 465 8885

Fax: (021) 465 8887

2nd Floor 9 Church Square Parliament Street
Cape Town 8001
South Africa

Disclaimer

The data for this site has been sourced form a range of organisations and websites and often received in formats that are hard to process. As a result, errors can occur - if you see something that you think is an error, please click on the "Correct This Page" button and let us know so that we can investigate. Please click here to read more about our source data.

  • Privacy
  • Give us feedback

This site runs on open source code written by mySociety.