Yes, Madam. The DA also finds the term "interim" problematic. There is already a decision by the Constitutional Court and I think the term "interim" is a way of getting around the true interpretation of what the court is ordering.
The DA also does not agree that the Bill, upon introduction, will be deemed to have been read a first time. We would clearly like to see the option of a First Reading debate specifically reflected in the Report.
Hon Ambrosini asked why it is that there are separate Rules for a First Reading debate when the executive introduce a Bill, as opposed to when a private member does it. On this basis we object to this report.