1. that the court wherein he presided, was properly constituted in that the prosecutor in his capacity as a prosecutor was present; 2. that the prosecutor put charges to the accused who had committed the traffic offence; 3. that the prosecutor had no address on the merits; 4. that the prosecutor proved no previous convictions; and 5. that the prosecutor had the opportunity to take part in the subsequent enquiries in terms of section 170(1) of Act 51 of 1977 for the failure of the accused to appear in court in the listed traffic offences reflected on the charge sheet.