Chairperson, I would like to rise on a point of order relating to the order that we have just dealt with. When Dr Oriani-Ambrosini raised a point of order and indicated that he had three points of order, the previous Chair ruled or forced him to sit down before he had raised his third point of order. Now, in terms of Rule 17, when a point of order is raised, the member called to order shall resume his or her seat. After the point of order has been raised with the Presiding Officer by the member, the Presiding Officer shall give his or her ruling or decision thereon. In this case, it did not happen. Can we get a ruling on this, Mr Chair?