Madam Deputy Speaker, the speakers' list reflects that I have 37 minutes, and I intend to use all of them.
The Bill is broadly supported. In fact, what this Bill does is to support the reality that this money Bill is amended by Parliament. It is very different now from the time it came in. I think all members would confirm that.
Perhaps just one issue I would like to touch on, and that is in response to what the hon Marais raised. The way in which we operate in respect of public benefit organisations is in fact to produce a list. There is no contradiction. The probing that we have done, both through Sars and the Treasury with a range of organisations, would indicate that they actually prefer a list. It takes out subjectivity. This is an objective list that these organisations need to comply with. With the fullness of time, I think it is possible to look at this.
If you examine the list of public benefit organisations in the schedules of the Income Tax Act now and look where they were 3 years ago, 5 years ago or 7 years ago, you can see that evolution. I think the same thing will happen here with organisations for the handicapped. I'm sorry, not the handicapped, but a person with a disability. [Interjections.] No, the Act says a person with a disability. There will be an evolution of these concepts as well.
Thank you very much for the support. I hope that we can now deal with the Revenue Laws Amendment Bill and the Revenue Laws Second Amendment Bill. Thank you. [Applause.]
Debate concluded.
Bill read a first time.