Yes, as I've said, that depends on the police investigation. Dit hang af van die polisie-ondersoeke. As daar bewyse van bedrog of korrupsie gekry word, sal daar voortgegaan word met die klagtes, maar ons moet op advies van die Staatsprokureur en senior advokaat optree in hierdie verband. Mens moet maar luister na die regsadvies wat jy kry. Hul advies was dat ons nie suksesvol gaan wees nie, tensy die polisie vir ons getuienis kan bring oor korrupsie en bedrog nie. Die R20 miljoen was net 'n bedrag wat 'n privaat waardeerder genoem het. Dit is nie 'n ... al die transaksies gestop in daardie verband is toe al gestop. So, jy kan nie s dit is R20 miljoen wat verlore is nie. Dit is juis die probleem. Dankie. (Translation of Afrikaans paragraph follows.)
[It depends on the police investigations. If proof of fraud or corruption are uncovered, the charges will be proceeded with, but we must act on the advice of the state attorney and senior advocate in this regard. One should listen to the legal advice that one gets. Their advice was that we will not be successful unless the police bring us proof of corruption and fraud. The R20 million was just an amount that was mentioned by a private evaluator. It is not a ... all the transactions stopped in this regard had been stopped by then. So you cannot say that it is R20 million that is lost. This is precisely the problem. Thank you.]