Chairperson, I want to thank all the speakers for their support, and in particular I want to welcome the recognition by a number of speakers that having in place competent, credible metrology accreditation and standardisation institutions is of very great value.
Issues of measurements, standards and accreditation are increasingly important, and so are issues of competitiveness. If you cannot meet basic standards, you cannot compete. They are also important matters of consumer protection and increasingly issues in international trade. As tariffs have come down and subsidies are under challenge, technical barriers to trade are becoming of increasing importance. And, if we are going to be a competent player in these areas, it is important that we have technical infrastructure in place that is up to the job.
I am also pleased that there was recognition that the Bills before us will contribute to the improvement and modernisation of our technical infrastructure and that there is broad support for the general direction.
I just want to comment on one point, which was raised by Dr Rabie, when he pleaded with the Minister to make sure that competent people were appointed. I should point out to him that both Bills require that the people who are appointed to the boards of these institutions have sufficient knowledge, experience and qualifications relating to the functions of these institutions. Of course, we want to maintain the standards. We want to ensure that the boards reflect our demographics and are in tune with the transformatory agenda. But, rest assured, maintaining the competence of these institutions will be our top priority. Thank you. [Applause.]
Debate concluded.
Measurement Units and Measurement Standards Bill read a second time.
Accreditation for Conformity Assessment, Calibration and Good Laboratory Practice Bill read a second time.