(1) Whether, with reference to the educational tour to the United States of America that she undertook in March 2011 to meet with her peers at the prison of the City of New York regarding best practice, she had been invited to undertake this tour; if not, who initiated the tour; if so, (a) by whom had she been invited, (b) what was the motivation to undertake the study tour to New York and (c)(i) how many persons from her department accompanied her, (ii) what were the total costs related to the visit by her and her staff and (iii)(aa) how many meetings were held and (bb) with which officials of the prison of the City of New York were they held and (d) what advantage did her department gain from the study tour; (2) whether a report on (a) her visit and (b) the findings that she made during her visit (i) was compiled and (ii) will be published; if not, why not, in each case; if so, what are the relevant details, in each case; (3) whether she (a) was requested or (b) herself requested to be accredited as a delegate to the 55th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women that was held at the United Nations during the same period in which her study tour had been offered; if so, by whom was she requested to do so; Friday, 1 April 2011] 378 INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: NATIONAL ASSEMBLY NO 10 ─2011 (4) whether she attended any meetings of the commission, which took place over a period of two weeks; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many and (b) which meetings did she attend; (5) whether she will make a statement on the matter ?