Whether, with regard to the reported irregularities in tender procurement at Tutuka Power Station that is still under investigation 19 months after the whistle-blower first lodged the complaint (details furnished), he and his department will perform their mandated duty of governance assurance and performance by intervening in the matter, escalating the investigation into irregularities at Tutuka, and keeping track of the progress of the complaint; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?