With regard to the decision by the SA National Taxi Council (Santaco) not to operate minibus taxi services in Cape Town, the impounding of minibus taxis and the fatal and destructive violence that erupted, what reasons were provided by Santaco for withholding public transport services
2) Whether any minibus taxis were unlawfully impounded by the City of Cape Town; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what total number and (b) for what reasons were the specified minibus taxis allegedly unlawfully impounded
3) Whether any minibus taxis were lawfully impounded by the City of Cape Town; if so what were the offences that led to the lawful impounding of the specified minibus taxis
4) Whether she will test the authority to impound a vehicle without the vehicle owner and/or operator being permitted to dispute the alleged offense before such vehicle is impounded in a court of law; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details
5) With regard to impoundments in terms of section 87 of the NLTA, no.5 of 2009, what are the reasons that she has not assigned the operating licence function to the City of Cape Town, as applied for in 2014, as municipalities would be in a better position to resolve operating permit conflicts and to adequately address public transport demands on certain routes if the planning and operating licence function could be integrated?