(1)What (a) legislative provisions were relied upon when amending the Public Service Regulation 61(6)(b), (b) constitutes privileged information as there is no such category in terms of Minimum Information Security Standards and (c) legislative provisions prohibit a whistleblower from disclosing privileged information to (i) a Parliamentary committee and (ii) the media;
(2) whether she has found that amended Public Service Regulation 61(6)(b) is in line with the Protected Disclosures Act, Act 26 of 2000 as it is now an offence and misconduct for a Senior Management Service member to disclose any privileged and/or confidential information obtained during the course of duty to an unauthorised person or persons, with a prohibited reemployment period for five (5) years if found guilty; if not, why not; if so, which provisions of the specified Act does the amendment align with;
(3) what (a) are the reasons that her department wants to manage the database public disclosures when it is not the custodian of the Act and gazetted procedures, as that is now contrary to the whistleblowing reporting regime of 2011 and (b) mechanisms and procedures have been made available to potential whistleblowers who intend to make a protected disclosure against her department itself, as what had happened recently?