The majority of bids received were of a good standard but contained many omissions and inconsistencies that had to be clarified. The key shortcomings identified during the financial evaluation process were listed. 33 bidders passed the financial evaluation. The majority of bidders submitted prices at or just below the applicable technology price cap. A comparison of the bidding prices for the various technologies for Window 1 and Window 2 was provided. The price differential was 25.1% for Solar PV, 11.3% for Onshore Wind and 6.5% for CSP.