Deputy Speaker, with due respect, I do not think that is a follow-up question. It is just a restatement of the original question, which I believe I have answered at quite some length. The hon member's follow-up question is premised on the existence of corruption. We have explained what the process of an audit is. We have explained that a disclaimer and a qualification do not necessarily equate to corruption. However, we do take those matters very seriously, because those things - those systemic problems and failures which result in disclaimers - do provide an environment that is conducive to the taking place of corruption and other criminal activity. Therefore, it is necessary to support municipalities in their improving and strengthening their financial systems. That is why we are taking the question of audits so seriously.
The question of lifestyle audits I explained in my initial answer, saying that I do not think the Minister has the power to institute such things. However, the department has put in place a range of other measures, including the regulations that are currently before Parliament and that require senior managers to disclose their interests on an annual basis, and that also make provision for those who are found to be guilty of fraud and corruption to be banned from being employed in municipalities for a period of 10 years. Thank you. [Applause.]