She further responded as follows: . The decision not to privatise had impacted the entity negatively because it created uncertainty on the future of the entity. . The cost structure of Safcol was too high for the revenue of Safcol. . Cabinet was yet to approve a policy on the participation in commercial projects. . The former CEO had a negotiated settlement due to a breakdown in relationship. He was paid an annual salary and had since challenged the entity for a bonus and benefits. The matter was in the roll call for arbitration. . There were no increases and bonuses for exco members for 2010/11. . Safcol had constructed timber frames structures for schools, clinics and other developmental projects.