Speaker, the discussion document which was released by the hon Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development yesterday noted that the reasons for the assessment of the Constitutional Court rulings was to evaluate the court's decisions against a desired transformation landscape. In fact, Minister Radebe's statement yesterday further confirmed our fears in the Democratic Alliance that the government wishes to co-opt the judiciary into its political policy programme through the mechanism of co-operative governance. Constitutionally co-operative governance is limited to the three spheres of government - local government, provincial government and national government - and the judiciary should be left to interpret the law free from any political interference. My question: Is this the purpose of the review? Is the purpose of the review to render the judiciary an extension of their executive arm of government; and if so, how does the government reconcile this with the constitutionally enshrined principle of the separation of powers?