(1) Why (a) the Government’s subsidy to the Voortrekker Monument has been terminated and (b) was there no prior notice to or discussion with the management of the Voortrekker Monument; (2) whether not giving notice is standard practice in his department; if not, (a) why did his department deviate from its customary practice and (b) what steps does he intend to take in order to correct this action; if so, in what way does this action meet the constitutional requirement of fair administrative action; (3) whether he will consider reinstating the subsidy; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?