Section 29 (4) of the Restitution of Land Rights Act of 1994 allows the Commission to pay for legal costs incurred by valid claimants. However, the claimants also had rights to seek legal advice from experts on their own account when the need arises. The Commission reported that it had never forced any claimant to seek legal experts or representation. 2. Responses to complaints about particular land claims The Commission, having studied the petition, reported that CONFLASA and IRASA were non-claimants because the Commission did not receive claims under those names; and Raapkraal Land Claim was a non-compliant claim. With regard to the District Six Action Committee, the Commission reported that it did not represent any claimant because the RLCC formed part of a Task Team that was addressing issues of the District Six Land Claim and the District Six Action Committee was not part of that Task Team. The District Six Action Committee was requested to submit power of attorney to the RLCC for it to be included in the task team.