Chairperson, this Budget Vote comes at an opportune time which is just after the local government elections have been held. There are imperative issues that need to be addressed before the dust settles. This Budget Vote also comes amidst very disturbing media reports on the executive leader of the department, and we anxiously wait to hear what the Public Protector will come up with.
I would also like to take this opportunity to wish the Minister a speedy recovery. On the same note, I would like to congratulate the Ministry and the entire department on receiving an unqualified audit report from the Auditor-General. Indeed, this is commendable, and we hope to see it replicated again and again. Having said that, the imperative and important task of addressing effectively and efficiently all the irregular expenses picked by the Auditor-General cannot be overstressed, since it is essential in rendering quality service delivery.
I acknowledge the progress made by the department in implementing the Local Government Turnaround Strategy and also the progress made in the provision of water, electricity and sanitation. Much work still needs to be done, though, and there can be no dull moment in the provision of these essential needs, which are inherent constitutional rights.
Amongst other priorities, we have heard and come to understand that the funding model for municipalities is deeply flawed and needs reviewing. This we view as an uppermost task, as service delivery to the masses depends on the fair distribution of funds across all spheres. Coherent and cohesive service delivery needs to underpin programmes and projects at national, provincial and local government level. That brings me to the following question: What is the department planning to do in order to address this flaw and when will Parliament be involved in such a process?
Mr Minister, one hurting and burning issue is that of making our traditional leaders ex-officio members of municipalities. What does that mean? It means that discussions will be held whether they are there or not. Their vote is meaningless. It is hurting. We respect our traditional leaders. Please, let that system be looked at. Thank you. [Time expired.]