The intention of the CIDB's submission was to support stakeholders that played a direct role in using geotechnical information/Geosciences in infrastructure development. The CIDB wished to first and foremost support the intention of the Bill. The organization also wished to endorse specifically the submission of the SAIEG and, to some extent, that of the NHBRC. Where the two organizations disagree, the CIDB would support the SAIEG. The CIBD specifically wished to draw attention to the following issues in support of their stakeholders: . Capacity issues: The Bill was ambitious in its mandate in that the Council for Geosciences was expected to do a lot of work, which might be impractical.