Mr Veldsman suggests that section 16 (2) (c), which provides that "the right to freedom of expression dose not extend to advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm" is deficient, as it does not include the full ambit of human contemplation. He argues that advocacy of hatred based on conscience, thought, belief and opinion is as repulsive as the advocacy of hatred based on religion. He suggests that the omission of these words in section 16(2)(c) might even be construed as permitting advocacy of hatred based on conscience. He therefore suggests that the terminology used in section 15, namely: "conscience, thought, belief and opinion" should be included in section 16(2) (c).