There are cases I dealt with and others I didn't, precisely because the court still had to pronounce on some of them. Therefore, they had not necessarily been dealt with at that time.
Supposing we were to grant all people ... You know that there was violence for many years and that those people were in prison and served their sentences.
As to the question as to whether that would have contributed to unity, I can't give a definite answer. We solved the question of violence. There is no violence now. We are now living in peace. If you were to ask that question, it would be as if there were still some problems.
There are no problems now. Matters were settled, and I am sure if they qualified they would have been released. Their families and their parties would have been very happy as well, because they would not have to come back and do the work.
I don't think it will make the impact that you are talking about. It would just be a normal kind of reunion with their families and their parties, and we would continue as we are. Thank you. [Applause.]
Particulars regarding ambit of proposed national debate on morality
6. Mrs P de Lille (ID) asked the President of the Republic:
Whether the national debate on morality (details furnished) that he called for will include the morality of persons in and connected to the Government benefiting financially from tenders; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?