The problem with follow-up questions that are based on newspaper articles is that you don't know whether they are factual or just sensational reporting. The rule of questions is quite clear that, if you asked a question based on a newspaper article, you must attach that article. There must be a verification process.
If you put that as a follow-up question without proper facts being put - it could have been just an article for purposes of sensation - it would be quite unfair to expect the Minister to respond to something that he might not even have read. He might not read the Sunday Times. He might have his own Sunday newspaper that he prefers to the Sunday Times. That is why I did not want to put the Minister in an uncomfortable position by responding to that.
Do you agree that the Minister responded to the issues as raised, even during the follow-up? That does not stop you, if you are still uncomfortable, from making a follow-up but not at this particular moment. We want to proceed on this matter.