You are correct, hon member. I am not sure which incident you refer to, but in rulings I've made as a Chairperson, I didn't take Points of Order only when people wanted. After I had made a ruling, they wanted to disagree about that ruling. If that's what you mean, you're right. When the Chair makes a ruling - that's exactly what I was saying - in most cases when we say we are going to look at the matter and come back to make a ruling, it is because we want to be sure.
So, when the presiding officer is saying "This is what I'm ruling", you might disagree but you cannot sit there and say it is wrong. Imagine if I did that to a magistrate when I was being sentenced; if I said, "I do not agree". There would be chaos in this country if we do that. [Applause.]