Order! Before the Deputy Minister answers, can I appeal to the House and those hon members who would like to ask questions, to take the word of the Deputy Minister for now. I will then look at that particular rule and come back with a response. I don't have a response in front of me now. So, I am saying we should take the word of the Deputy Minister. Those people who would like to ask questions must ask questions, but we cannot say that the Deputy Minister's application of the sub judice rule is wrong. Can we do that, until we have the interpretation of the rule in front of us?