Chairperson, the appointment of commissioners for the SA Human Rights Commission is a very important moment in the further development of constitutional rights in South Africa and definitely deserves the careful attention of the National Assembly.
Cope supports the candidates as recommended by the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development. However, concerns are raised regarding one of the candidates, Adv Loyiso Mpumlwana. Parliament must ensure the recommendation of individuals who have the necessary commitment to the protection and advancement of human rights and constitutionalism in South Africa, as well as the qualities and track record to demonstrate their suitability for such a significant position.
Although not specifically questioned about it, the impression created from Adv Mpumlwana's CV was that he was first appointed as a senior legal adviser in the premier's office in the Eastern Cape and thereafter as the regional head investigator for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
What the CV did not specify is the fact that he was employed in the premier's office at the same time that he was employed by the TRC. From a statement issued by the TRC, he was found guilty of 8 out of 10 charges brought against him relating to fraudulent misrepresentation.
Clearly, Adv Mpumlwana does not have the desirable attributes that South Africa demands from a human rights commissioner or, at the very least, have the attributes to be regarded as a fit and proper person with high competence and integrity.
The integrity and ethical standards of the SA Human Rights Commission lie at the very heart of the fair and impartial commission envisaged by the Constitution. With a candidate like Adv Mpumlwana one can only hope that the SAHRC, like the TRC, will not be embroiled again in controversy. Thank you.