(1) What was the outcome of a departmental investigation into (a) a tender awarded to and (b) payments made to a certain company (name furnished) without verifying delivery against payment and (c) the role of a certain official (details furnished) in the allocation of a 100% subsidy to the company; (2) whether he intends taking any action against any person implicated in the irregular tender award; if not, why not; if so, what action; (3) (a) why did the service provider not meet the deadline for the connection of the schools and access centres, (b) what action does his department intend to take in this regard and (c) how does his department intend to recover amounts overpaid to two certain companies (names furnished); (4) whether he intends to call for a forensic audit of the financial affairs of the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA) and the Universal Service and Access Fund (USAF); if not, why not; if so, when; (5) whether he intends to disband the USAASA Board and appoint an administrator to run the affairs of the agency pending the outcome of the forensic investigation; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?