(1) (a) What were the reasons taken into consideration when it was decided to suspend a certain person (details furnished) at the Companies and Intellectual Property Registration Office (Cipro) at the beginning of 2009, (b) why is it deemed necessary for him still to be suspended after more than a year and (c) which of the delays in finalising this matter (i) have been caused by or (ii) were requested by Cipro; (2) what has been the total cost of this labour action in terms of (a) (i) salary and (ii) benefits of the incumbent for the period of suspension, (b) the costs of getting external chairpersons for the disciplinary hearings and (c) any other costs related to this disciplinary action?