(1) With reference to her reply to question 589 on 23 March 2010, what is the current status of this project; (2) whether there have been any changes to the composition of the winning consortium (name furnished); if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether any entities that make up this consortium have taken legal action against the consortium; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether all the entities that make up this consortium are capable of providing equity to the project; if not, how was this conclusion reached; if so, what are the relevant details; (5) whether the adjudication panel that awarded the tender conducted the required due diligence on all the bids before deciding on the winning bid; if not, what steps will be taken to rectify the situation; if so, how was this conclusion reached?