Whether, with reference to her reply to question 668 on 1 September 2014, she will demonstrate how there is a real risk that the pending proceedings will substantially and demonstrably be prejudiced if the information sought is published as per the Supreme Court’s ruling on the use of the sub judice rule in the Midi Television (Pty) Ltd case (details furnished) in 2007; if so, what are the relvant details; if not, is Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng still earning the R2,4 million salary that the Public Protector found was awarded to him irregularly?