Thank you very for that question. The answer to your question is that there were over 800 submissions, responding to the request we had made to the public. Now the basic approach that we took was that those contributions which are internally consistent with the direction of the paper will be incorporated, but those which were internally inconsistent would be acknowledged, it was nice but not helpful. So, we are in the process now of incorporating
that which is internally consistent. Some of them very, very useful comments but, if a comment for example says; my contribution is that this paper is neoliberal, George Soros and so on, that is internally inconsistent and therefore not helpful [Laughter.] Or somebody says the macroeconomic policy that must underpin this paper must be the abolishment of inflation targeting, that is internally inconsistent and therefore would not be taken into account.
So we appreciate those who have made contributions which are internally consistent with the paper, because they strengthen the paper, we very much appreciate that. Thank very much.