Chairperson, the Minister gave us a lecture on the Constitution, and then he gave us a lecture on the law.[Interjections.] However, it is very clear that the Minister does not understand the law.
I say that because the Minister said that the threat was a threat of disruption. Given the fact that the threat of disruption is not terrorism, is not espionage, is not the exposure of state secrets, is not serious violence, and given that the threat of disruption is not a national security matter, will the Minister tell us what authority in law the State Security Agency, SSA, had in order to exercise domestic intelligence and counterintelligence functions ahead of the state of the nation address?
If the Minister can't point to the exact section in the law, I would suggest that he reconsider his position and resign. [Applause.] [Interjections.]