Speaker, I fail to understand in the question what it is that is alleged to be a step that undermines the Public Protector's office. I don't get it, because the hon member says that Cabinet took a decision that the Secretary to Cabinet should interact with the Public Protector. Now, does that undermine anything? I don't think so, because it means that Cabinet may want to get clarity on the matter.
If you recall, that report states things, specifically, that the Secretary to Cabinet must do, as well as the Minister. So, why should the Secretary to Cabinet not interact to clarify issues, so that he is clearer on what to do about the determinations that have been made by the Public Protector? I don't see anything undermining the office of the Public Protector. I see collaboration and co-ordination in an attempt to address the issues. [Applause.]