I rise on a point of order: The motion before the House was brought in terms of section 102(2) of the Constitution, which is a constitutional provision. The Rules of the House and therefore the presiding officer, in my view, can never and should never override a constitutional provision. We therefore submit, as Cope, that you cannot use Rule 96(c) to allow the proposed amendment, because to do so simply means we are going to use Rules to trample the Constitution. The Rules are supposed to enhance the implementation of the Constitution and never to subvert the Constitution. Thank you. [Applause.]