Before you get excited about the slow march of bureaucracy, ... [Interjections.] Hon Ellis, I'm not allowed to point a finger at you in the House. It's not about that. In fact, if you look at it, hon James, I think we have to balance between speed and thoroughness. We don't want to rush this process only to find that we missed a lot of dimensions.
Again, if you look at the terms of reference of the review committee, each one of them is quite involved. We want as much information as possible. But, if you look at the information we want over a period of six months, it is not too long a period. So, we have to strike a balance between the two. We, ourselves, are aware of the urgency with which we have to address these matters.
Whether we raise the limit of income of parents of students who qualify, that will come with the review itself.
Just to end off, there are quite a number of other issues that will need to be addressed. For instance, do you provide as many students as possible with part loans or part bursaries, or do you provide fewer students with complete loans or bursaries so that you don't have a problem where some students have accommodation and tuition, but don't have money for food?
So, I think that given the scale of the task and the urgency, six months balances both. I think we are moving at the necessary speed, but without undue haste in a manner that would compromise what we want to achieve. [Applause.]